题干

对下列句子中画线语句的表达效果,理解有误的一项是(    )

A:仅仅有一次,她的教鞭好像要落下来,我用石板一迎,教鞭轻轻地敲在石板边上,大伙笑了,她也笑了。理解:画线句的两个“笑”字写出了学生愉快地接受老师的体罚,老师感到欣慰。

B:在她的女朋友的园子里,她还让我们观察蜜蜂,就是在那时候,我认识了蜂王,并且平生第一次吃了蜂蜜。理解:“平生第一次”,可见印象之深。

C:即使她写字的时候,我们也默默地看着她,连她握铅笔的姿势都急于模仿。理解:用“连……都……”的句式,突出了学生模仿老师的范围之广,强调了老师对学生的影响和学生对老师的爱。

D:每逢放假的时候,我们就更不愿离开她。我还记得,放假前我默默地站在她的身边,看她收拾这样那样东西的情景。理解:写出了孩子与自己喜爱的老师依依惜别的情景。

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2018-03-18 06:11:30

答案(点此获取答案解析)

A

同类题2

阅读理解

     The World Meat Free Day for 2017 falls on 12, June, but what would actually happen if the whole world suddenly went vegetarian(素食的) permanently?

     If vegetarianism were accepted by everyone by 2050, the world would have about seven million fewer deaths every year. No meat would lower the chances of some diseases or even some cancers and so save the world 2-3% global GDP in medical bills. Food-related emissions would drop by around 60%. This would be due to getting rid of red meat which come from methane (甲烷) producing livestock (家畜) — from people's diets. Turning former pastures (牧场) into native habitats and forests would slow climate change and bring back lost biodiversity, including some animals which were previously pushed out or killed in order to keep cattle.

    However, farmers in the developing world could really suffer. Arid and semi-arid lands can only be used to raise animals as there's no or little water in these places, such as the Sahel land strip in Africa next to the Sahara; nomadic (游牧的) groups that keep livestock there would be forced to settle permanently and lose their cultural identities if there were no more meat. Losing meat also means that we also lose traditions. There's no more Christmas turkey. We would need to replace meat with nutritional substitutes, in particular for the world's estimated two billion-plus unhealthy or weak people for lack of nutrients. Animal products contain more nutrients per calorie than staples like grains and rice.

    Everybody currently engaged in the livestock industry would need to be retrained for a new career. This could be in agriculture, reforestation or producing bioenergy. Failing to provide career alternatives could lead to mass unemployment and social problems, particularly in traditionally rural communities.