题干

阅读下面的文言文,完成下面小题。

    范侯蒙,字元功,密州高密人。未,有俊声,急义好施,或一日挥干金。进士及第,调宝鸡尉,知柏乡县。民讼皆决于庭,受罚者不怨。转运使黄湜闻其名,将推毂之,召诣行台白事,蒙以越境不肯往。湜怒,他日行县,阅理文书,欲翻致其罪;既而无一疵可指,始以宾礼见,曰:“君真能吏也。”率诸使者合荐之。

    西将高永年死于羌,帝怒,亲书五路将帅刘仲武等十八人姓名,敕蒙往秦州逮治。至秦,仲武等囚服听命,蒙晓之曰:“君辈皆侯伯,无庸以狱吏辱君,第以实对。”案未上,又拜御史中丞。蒙奏言:“汉武帝杀王恢①,不如秦缪公赦孟明;子玉②缢而晋侯喜,孔明亡而蜀国轻。今羌杀吾一都护,而使十八将繇之而死,是自艾其支体也。欲身不病,得乎?”帝悟,释不问。

    迁刑部尚书,改户部。比岁郊祭先期告办,尚书辄执政。至是,帝密谕之。对曰:“以财利要君而进,非臣所敢。”一日,帝从容问:“蔡京何如人?”对曰:“使京能正其心术,虽古贤相何以加。”帝颌首,且使密伺京所为。京闻而衔之。

    大钱法敞,朝廷议改十为三,主藏吏来告曰:“诸府悉辇大钱市物于肆,皆疑法当变。”蒙曰:“吾府之积若干?”曰:“八干缗。”蒙叱曰:“安有更革而吾不知!”明日,制下。又尝有几事蒙独受旨,京不知也;京侦得之,白于帝,帝曰:“候蒙亦如是邪?”罢知毫州。

    宋江寇京东,蒙上书言:“江以三十六人横行齐魏官军数万无敢抗者其才必过人今青溪盗起不若赦江使讨方腊以自赎。”帝曰:“蒙居外不忘君,忠臣也。”命知东平府,未赴而,年六十八。

(节选自《宋史·侯蒙传》 )

【注】①王恢:伏击匈奴,单于察觉而撤军。汉武帝大怒,曰:“今不诛恢,无以谢天下!”②子玉:楚成王时为令尹。晋楚城濮决战,楚军败,未遇赦,子玉自杀。

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2019-05-30 11:46:45

答案(点此获取答案解析)

同类题2

阅读理解
D
    Hollywood's theory that machines with evil(邪恶) minds will drive armies of killer robots is just silly. The real problem relates to the possibility that artificial intelligence(AI) may become extremely good at achieving something other than what we really want. In 1960 a well-known mathematician Norbert Wiener, who founded the field of cybernetics(控制论), put it this way: “If we use, to achieve our purposes, a mechanical agency with whose operation we cannot effectively interfere(干预), we had better be quite sure that the purpose which we really desire.”
    A machine with a specific purpose has another quality, one that we usually associate with living things: a wish to preserve its own existence. For the machine, this quality is not in-born, nor is it something introduced by humans; it is a logical consequence of the simple fact that the machine cannot achieve its original purpose if it is dead. So if we send out a robot with the single instruction of fetching coffee, it will have a strong desire to secure success by disabling its own off switch or even killing anyone who might interfere with its task. If we are not careful, then, we could face a kind of global chess match against very determined, super intelligent machines whose objectives conflict with our own, with the real world as the chessboard.
    The possibility of entering into and losing such a match should concentrate the minds of computer scientists. Some researchers argue that we can seal the machines inside a kind of firewall, using them to answer difficult questions but never allowing them to affect the real world. Unfortunately, that plan seems unlikely to work: we have yet to invent a firewall that is secure against ordinary humans, let alone super intelligent machines.
    Solving the safety problem well enough to move forward in AI seems to be possible but not easy. There are probably decades in which to plan for the arrival of super intelligent machines. But the problem should not be dismissed out of hand, as it has been by some AI researchers. Some argue that humans and machines can coexist as long as they work in teams—yet that is not possible unless machines share the goals of humans. Others say we can just “switch them off” as if super intelligent machines are too stupid to think of that possibility. Still others think that super intelligent AI will never happen. On September 11, 1933, famous physicist Ernest Rutherford stated, with confidence, “Anyone who expects a source of power in the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” However, on September 12, 1933, physicist Leo Szilard invented the neutron-induced(中子诱导) nuclear chain reaction.