阅读《低头与昂首》一文，回答后面的问题
                                                                                                    低头与昂首
        ①富兰克林被称为美国之父。在谈起成功之道时，他说这一切源于一次拜访。在他年轻的时候，一位老前辈请他到一座低矮的小茅屋中见面。富兰克林来了，他挺起胸膛，大步流星，一进门，“砰”的一声，额头重重地撞在门框上，顿时肿了起来，疼得他哭笑不得。老前辈看到他这副样子，笑了笑说：“很疼吧!可这是你今天最大的收获。一个人要想洞察世事，练达人情，就必须时刻记住低头。”
        ②富兰克林把这次拜访当成一次悟道，他牢牢记住了老前辈的教导，把谦虚列为他一生的生活准则。
        ③要取得成功，首先就要学会低头。这恰如演奏一支高昂的曲子，起首往往是低调的。低头，既是正确认识自己，也是对他人的一种尊重。什么时候都高昂着头，实际上是抬高自己，看低别人。你瞧不起别人，人家干嘛要瞧得起你呢?因此，你再优秀，再有名，也没有人愿意与你合作。
        ④当然，低头并不意味着把自己不当人。低头不应该是流水，越流越低。一支曲子，越唱越低，就会唱不下去。有人把低头理解为唯唯诺诺、忍让一切，理解为逆来顺受、低声下气，这是不正确的。有这样一个故事：有个公司招聘员工，门外排着长长的队伍，应聘者一个接一个进去接受考试。每进去一个，主考官不由分说，凌空劈来一记耳光。主考官问：“这是什么滋味?”捂着脸出来的人都落选了，他们是低头的人。后来有个年轻人进去，主考官同样劈来一记耳光，说：“这是什么滋味?”年轻人定了定神，以同样的速度，同样的力量，给主考官同样一记耳光，说：“就是这个滋味。”出人意料的是，这个年轻人被录用了。
        ⑤富兰克林以低头抵达成功，年轻人却以昂首被录用，这是不是矛盾的呢?
        ⑥不，其实为人处世真正的法则是把自己摆在一个恰当的位置上：在摆放自己处的位置时，我们应该是富兰克林；而在摆放我们自己心的位置时，我们必须是那个年轻人。也就是说，我们应该低头处世，昂首做人。

解释下面各句中加下划线词语的意思。

渔人甚异之____                                 

欲穷其林  ____                                      

便要还家 ____                                      

便扶向路____                                       

欣然规往 ____                                       

后遂无问津者____                                    

屋舍俨然 ____                                     

有良田美池桑竹之属____               

    There are many different voices on charity donations recently. Chen TianQiao, one of the Chinese billionaires, gave away $115 million to the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) to help promote brain research. Chen has been interested in the brain research, believing it can advance the industries of artificial intelligence and virtual reality. However, this huge donation has caused heated discussion among Chinese scholars and internet users.

    Many criticized him for giving money to a foreign university rather than domestic institutes for brain research, which are developing fast and are catching up with the US in just a few years. RaoYi, a biologist at Peking University, even said the donation was a typical mistake.

    Others, however, support his choice. They believe Caltech is a more reasonable choice compared with Chinese research Institutes. Caltech has a long history and has taken a leading position in biology, and therefore it produces more efficient results. What's more, the results of the research will benefit not only the Americans, but also the rest of the world.

    A similar controversial（有争议的）case started two years ago when Pan ShiYi, chairman of SOHO China, donated $15 million to Harvard University to help disadvantaged Chinese Students.

    Many believe that China is still far behind in management and use of donated money, and that as a result, Chinese donators are looking abroad. In comparison, Western countries like the US, which have a long history of donating money, have well-developed systems that use money efficiently. They can also provide full access for donors who want to track the use of the money. To get more donations, Chinese universities should be braver and more honest. They need self-reflection rather than envy.