题干

阅读下文,回答相关问题
                                                                                                     不爱你爱谁
        ①我出生的时候,母亲忍受切腹之痛,对着我含情脉脉地微笑。小时候听母亲讲故事,才体验到她那浓浓的母爱。那天,母亲生出我之后,麻药还没过,正忍受着疼痛。可她的脑海里全是我,担心着我的健康状况。思念的力量如此强大,使备受折磨的母亲一直挺到医生把我抱过来。当时母亲泪光闪闪,亲切关爱的笑容由心而发。医生把我抱给母亲看:呀,白色的围巾里包着一个黑溜溜圆滚滚的小东西,大大的脑袋,清澈的大眼睛,尖尖的鼻子,小巧的嘴唇,标志的瓜子脸。母亲心里那个兴奋,如天下父母心,悲喜交集,喜的远远大于生我的疼痛。母亲抱着我,轻轻地摇啊摇,拍呀拍,唱着一首首她熟悉的歌谣“月光光,照地堂,虾子你乖乖睡下床……”听说母女之间是有心灵感应的,听着这首充满母爱的歌,我的哭闹声停止了,乖乖睡在母亲的怀抱中。
        ②慢慢的,在母亲无微不至的关爱下,懵懂的我已长成一个头发卷卷,眉毛弯弯,眼睛清澈如水的小孩童。成长的故事多得数不清,只是,那时的我不知母亲养育我的艰辛。那时,我的家坐落在一个宽宽的庭院里,绿瓦红墙,古老朴素,仿佛是我的外婆,化身成坚固的城墙,在她宽广的怀抱中,我们才得以安心的成长。蓝蓝的天空白白的云,高大的绿树,青青的小草,怒放的花儿,幽幽的清风,响亮的鸟声,阵阵的蛙鸣。这是一个四季如春的地方,春夏穿着短袖,秋冬穿着薄薄的长衫。
        ③我们的院子里,种着各种蔬菜和水果,养着吃碎石的大公鸡。母亲经常给菜园浇水施肥,等他们长得膘肥体壮,母亲便全部摘下来,切成丝,放少许的猪油,爆点蒜,大火焖炒,一盘香喷喷的菜就上桌了。闻着浓浓的菜香味,我们的口水直流,可是父亲在的时候,我不敢动筷子,害怕他打我,在他的观念里,必须尊卑有序,不等齐人绝不吃饭。
        ④等我长大一些,就开始了专心致志的读书生涯,就不再总是缠着母亲。这以后,她才有时间发展自己的爱好。母亲喜欢用凤凰牌缝纫机做衣服、做被套、做各种袋子。她赶制衣服的时候,都是废寝忘食的。当时,我总是埋怨母亲的这个爱好。可是,渐渐才发现,我那质地柔软的睡衣,夏天透风透气,够宽够大,才不至于满身是汗;我睡觉时搂着的被套,冰冰凉凉的,无论在夏天燥热的时候,怎么扯,怎么糟蹋,被子的边都是完好无损的。那些袋子就更不用说了,图案有红、有绿、有黄、有紫,总之像七色的彩虹,五彩缤纷,耐用结实,可以拿着套子,装进去,随身携带,可方便了,而且母亲在袋子的另一边,缝上好几个扣子,这样可以整齐的折叠起来,不用为不方便不美观而烦恼。
        ⑤天有不测风云,人有旦夕祸福。高考的时候,我得了重病。四个多月,120个风风雨雨朝朝暮暮,太阳升起的时候,母亲便带着我在灿烂的阳光中奔跑;太阳下山的时候,母亲急忙从单位赶过来,中午从来不睡觉,熬了鲫鱼汤,晚上冒雨给我带过来,风雨无阻,从没落下过一次。
       ⑥我病了十年,母亲就含辛茹苦的照顾了我十年。除了上班,母亲还要照顾我的饮食起居,在我参加成人高考的时候,母亲顶着烈日,为我拭去额头上的汗水,温柔地对我说:“女儿,别害怕,别慌张,排除杂念,认真考试,只要你努力过,就对得起自己,我们不能以成败论英雄,好样的,加油,妈妈支持你!”上午的语文考砸了,出了教室,我面无表情,心情极度低落,母亲看在眼里,却没有表现出难过的表情,反而微笑地对我说:“女儿,别担心,振作起来,不要影响下一科考试!”下午,母亲依然顶着烈日,在猛烈的阳光下站了两个小时。在母亲的关心和鼓励下,我成功的考入了中山大学。
        ⑦几十年的相处,几十年的风风雨雨,几十年的母爱,几十年的坚持与不弃,我清清楚楚的知道,母亲是一位慈爱、热情、不怕苦不怕累、对子女无限关爱的伟大的母亲!
        ⑧回忆着几十年与母亲的点点滴滴,我好想对她说:“母亲,我不爱你爱谁?!”

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2015-03-31 10:37:04

答案(点此获取答案解析)

同类题3

阅读理解
D
    Hollywood's theory that machines with evil(邪恶) minds will drive armies of killer robots is just silly. The real problem relates to the possibility that artificial intelligence(AI) may become extremely good at achieving something other than what we really want. In 1960 a well-known mathematician Norbert Wiener, who founded the field of cybernetics(控制论), put it this way: “If we use, to achieve our purposes, a mechanical agency with whose operation we cannot effectively interfere(干预), we had better be quite sure that the purpose which we really desire.”
    A machine with a specific purpose has another quality, one that we usually associate with living things: a wish to preserve its own existence. For the machine, this quality is not in-born, nor is it something introduced by humans; it is a logical consequence of the simple fact that the machine cannot achieve its original purpose if it is dead. So if we send out a robot with the single instruction of fetching coffee, it will have a strong desire to secure success by disabling its own off switch or even killing anyone who might interfere with its task. If we are not careful, then, we could face a kind of global chess match against very determined, super intelligent machines whose objectives conflict with our own, with the real world as the chessboard.
    The possibility of entering into and losing such a match should concentrate the minds of computer scientists. Some researchers argue that we can seal the machines inside a kind of firewall, using them to answer difficult questions but never allowing them to affect the real world. Unfortunately, that plan seems unlikely to work: we have yet to invent a firewall that is secure against ordinary humans, let alone super intelligent machines.
    Solving the safety problem well enough to move forward in AI seems to be possible but not easy. There are probably decades in which to plan for the arrival of super intelligent machines. But the problem should not be dismissed out of hand, as it has been by some AI researchers. Some argue that humans and machines can coexist as long as they work in teams—yet that is not possible unless machines share the goals of humans. Others say we can just “switch them off” as if super intelligent machines are too stupid to think of that possibility. Still others think that super intelligent AI will never happen. On September 11, 1933, famous physicist Ernest Rutherford stated, with confidence, “Anyone who expects a source of power in the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” However, on September 12, 1933, physicist Leo Szilard invented the neutron-induced(中子诱导) nuclear chain reaction.