题干

根据运算定律填上适当的数.

125×(____×8)=(____×____)×7

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2017-09-14 02:46:10

答案(点此获取答案解析)

7,125,8

同类题1

 阅读下文,回答相关问题

城市是乡村的纪念碑
刘贤冰
①很久没有回家乡了。那个炊烟袅袅的小村子,是一剂良药,须得按时服用。想必是,在田野里耍大的孩子,即使在城里呆得再久,部份散漫的野性也难以去除吧。这些年,想念村庄,已然成了一项必修的功课,或者是一种间歇性痛灶,而且,其频率随年岁的增长而增长。
②这种想念,实在不是什么轻松的事。想念一个人,是可以有所凭借的,所谓睹物思人,至少给思念留了个出口;而且,还有现代通讯工具帮忙。可是,在喧嚣的城市里想念村庄,就如笼中之鸟想念山林般,找不到一草一木一石的依据,所有的想像,都会被金属丝无情地阻隔,只剩下烦躁的心绪。我可以给家乡的亲人通电话,可是,村庄是一个集合概念,是一部完整的童年历史。我的思念,又怎能通过一根电话线真正抵达村庄的内心呢?
③坐在公共汽车上,各种建筑物扑面而来,马路两旁的景物快速移开。我知道,它们是不会彻底地给我的目光让路的;我不会天真地以为,那些物体移开之后,我会看到我所熟悉的田野和牛羊,还有从屋瓦缝隙里钻出的炊烟。
④我了解,城市在不停地讨好我。它永无休止地制造着陌生的事物,不断地变幻着色彩,让各种车辆像池塘里的鱼一样游动......这样看起来它是多么鲜活,多么富于动感。它所有的企图,就是让我忘掉村庄。可是,城市的表演,并不符合我的性情,它不断离间着我和村庄的关系,这只能增加我对村庄更加深切的思念。
⑤每天,我在城市里坐车,在城市里漫步,看城市上空偶尔飞过的小鸟,打量城市马路旁的树木花草,试图寻找关于村庄的蛛丝马迹。因为我始终不肯相信,城市会将村庄彻底地掩埋,将村庄彻底地阻断......
⑥忽然有一天,当我的目光无意中停在一块站牌上时,一下子惊呆了。我坚信,我找到了村庄!确切地说,我发现了村庄的名字。那块很不起眼的公共汽车站牌上,密密麻麻地写满了村庄的名字:上钱村,下钱村,吴家湾,马家庄......虽然不是我的家乡,但它们作为村庄,也意味着一群乡人的远徒......我突然感到,那块站牌,不就是消逝了的村庄的纪念碑吗?而此时,汽车广播里,正一遍遍地播报着村庄的名字,仿佛在召唤着村庄的亡魂。
⑦又岂止是那块小小的站牌上写着村庄的名字,每一块站牌,每一条马路,甚至每一个街巷,到处都是村庄的名字,人们每天都在念叨着村庄的名字......村庄消失了,村庄的名字顽强地生存下来了。或者说,当村庄消失的时候,它把名字传给了城市。如此说来,城市不过是一个谎言。它生长在乡村的土地上,沿袭着村庄的名字,延续了乡村的生命,但它却在一天天地背叛着乡村,制造着关于城市的谎言。
⑧当我回到家,急切地打开城市地图时,惊讶地发现,我们整座城市,我们引以为豪的繁华都市,它实际是由一个个小村庄连接而成的。地图上,那些村庄的名字,星罗棋布,赫然在目;那些名字,灵动鲜活,栩栩如生,即使历经千年,也不可能被钢筋混凝土彻底掩埋。
⑨而我们所谓的城市,看起来则更像一座硕大无比的纪念碑,矗立在乡村的土地上,无时无刻不在祭奠着被它掩埋在地下的村庄。

同类题2

阅读理解

    Antiquities are ancient objects and artworks. Museums acquire works to display from many different sources. Sometimes they purchase them. Other times they receive donations. Today there are strict rules forbidding art that has been stolen from other countries. However, antiquities that have been at museums for decades or even centuries may have arrived there by questionable means. Now, some countries claim that museums have a responsibility to return these antiquities to their original locations.

    There are many examples of this debate. Perhaps the most famous is the argument between Greece and the UK over the Elgin marbles. In the early 19th century, the Earl (伯爵) of Elgin had numerous sculptures taken from Greece to the UK. When Elgin did this, Greece was still a part of the Ottoman Empire. He claimed that he had received a permit to export the sculptures. Today the marbles are on display in the British Museum^ However, Greece wants them to be returned to their original location.

    Should museums return these antiquities? Experts disagree. Malcolm Bell III says yes. Bell is a retired professor of art at the University of Virginia. He says, “Many antiquities and artworks have special cultural value for a particular community or nation. When these works are removed from their original cultural setting they lose their context and the culture loses a part of its history.”

    According to Bell, a country's request for the return of an antiquity “usually has a strong legal basis.” It “was exported illegally, and is now stolen property.” He called the return of antiquities “an expression of justice.”

    James Cuno says not always. Cuno is president of an art museum in Los Angeles. He is also the author of the book Who Owns Antiquity?. Cuno agrees that museums have “a social and legal responsibility” to return illegally exported antiquities. However, he doesn't support the return of legally acquired works.

    “An area of land held today by a given nation-state in the past likely belonged to a different political entity (实体). Even if one wanted to reunite scattered works of art, where would one do so? Which among the many countries, cities, and museums in possession of parts of a work of art should be the chosen 'home' of the reunited work?” Cuno believes that museums should collect art from the world's diverse cultures. This should be done “through purchase or long-term loan and working in cooperation with museums and nations around the world.”

    This debate is far from over. As a complex question with no easy answer, the issue requires more study.