题干

如图1,在菱形ABCD中,AC=2,BD=2 3 ,AC,BD相交于点O.

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2015-05-11 04:40:59

答案(点此获取答案解析)

同类题1

根据短文理解,选择正确答案。

In a Station of the Metro

    The apparition of these faces in the crowd;Petals on a wet, black bough.

    This is the only Ezra Pound poem that many people will read in their lives. Why? One obvious reason is that it's just two lines long. The poem, which can be understood as “A man sees a bunch of faces in the subway and thinks they look like flowers on a tree branch,” is an exercise in shortness. Pound wrote it after having a spiritual experience in a Paris metro (subway) station.

    In 1916, the US poet originally thought he could best describe his vision in a painting. Unfortunately, he wasn't a painter. So he wrote a thirty-line poem, which he didn't like. He dropped the long version in the waste bin. Six months later, he wrote a shorter poem, but didn't like that one either. Finally, a full year after the experience, he had been reading short Japanese poems called haikus, and he figured he would try this style. The result, which was published in 1913, is one of the most famous and influential works in modern poetry.

    This poem is one of the monuments (纪念物) of the 20th-century artistic movement known as “Imagism”. Basically, Pound and his friends thought that images (意象) weren't just decoration: they were the highest form of speech. By finding the right image, the poet can express the true, spiritual reality of a thing, which is more important than using a bunch of adjectives to describe its physical appearance. Thus, “In a Station of the Metro” is a poem that consists of one image expressed with absolute (绝对的) exactness and nothing else.

    To the imagists, the best way to describe an experience is not to use more and more words; the best way is to find exactly the right words. Have you ever told a beloved one that “words can't express” how much you love them? Well, Pound would say that you're just being lazy. In his view, words can express anything, even if it takes an entire year to find the right ones.

同类题5

阅读下面的文字,完成下面小题。

    在今日市场经济的环境中,诚信的缺失——以及随之而来的信任的缺失——已是一个公认的事实。

    其原因还得从我们自己身上寻找。现在有些人把诚信的缺失归咎于市场经济,这种认识水平比起严复来不知倒退了多少。

    其实,诚信的缺乏正表明中国的市场经济尚不够成熟,其规则和秩序未能建立健全并得到维护。而之所以如此,近因甚多也甚复杂,远因一定可以追溯到文化传统和国民素质。西方人文传统中有一个重要观念,便是人的尊严,其经典表达就是康德所说的“人是目的”。按照这个观念,每个人都是一个有尊严的精神性存在,不可被当作手段使用。一个人怀有这种做人的尊严感,与人打交道时就会有一种自尊的态度,仿佛如此说:这是我的真实想法,我愿意对它负责。这就是诚实和守信用。他也会这样去尊重他人,仿佛如此说:我要知道你的真实想法,并相信你会对它负责。这就是信任。可见诚信和信任是以彼此共有的人的尊严之意识为基础的。相比之下,中国儒家的文化传统中缺少人的尊严的观念,因而诚信和信任就缺乏深刻的精神基础。

    也许有人会说,“信”在儒家伦理中也占据着重要的位置。不错,孔子常常谈“信”,《论语》中论及诚实守信含义上的“信”就有十多处。但是,在儒家伦理系统中,“信”的基础不是人的尊严,而是封建等级秩序。所以,毫不奇怪,孔子常把“信”置于“忠”之后而连称“忠信”,例如“主忠信”“言忠信”“子以四教:文,行,忠,信”等。可见“信”是从属于“忠”的,诚实守信归根到底要服从权力上的尊卑和血缘上的亲疏。在道德实践中,儒家的“信”往往表现为所谓仗义。仗义和信任貌似相近,实则属于完全不同的道德谱系。信任是独立的个人之间的关系,一方面各人有自己的人格、价值观、生活方式、利益追求等,在这些方面彼此尊重,绝不要求一致,另一方面合作做事时都遵守规则。仗义却相反,一方面抹杀个性和个人利益,样样求同,不能容忍差异,另一方面共事时不讲规则。在中国的商场上,几个朋友合伙做生意,一开始因为哥们儿义气或因为面子而利益不分,规则不明,最后打得不可开交,终成仇人,这样的事例不知有多少。

    毫无疑问,要使诚信和信任方面的可悲现状真正改观,根本途径是发展市场经济,完善其规则和秩序。不过,基于上述认识,我认为同时很有必要认真检讨我们的文化传统,使国民素质逐步适应而不是严重阻碍这个市场经济健全化的过程。

(摘编自周国平《诚信、信任和人的尊严》)