题干

阅读下列材料,回答问题。

材料一 国家最高权力属于全体人民,人民是国家主权的主体、拥有者和行使者。主权“是完全绝对的、神圣的、完全不可侵犯的”。主权“永远不可转让;并且主权者既然只是一个集体的生命,所以就只能由他自己来代表本人”;“正如主权是不能转让的一样,同理,主权也是不能代表的”。人民主权只能通过直接民主实现。如果任何人拒不服从公共意志,全体就要强迫他服从,“这即是说,人们要迫使他自由”。

——卢梭《社会契约论》

材料二 在南北美洲,启蒙运动也有着直接的、非常重大的影响。在拉丁美洲,新的学说由于官员、商人和移民川流不息地到来而得到传播。有位历史学家在分析了哲人们的著作在拉丁美洲的大学和私人图书馆中的广泛传播之后,下结论说,启蒙运动显然影响了……约1808年前后达到成熟的整整一代人,导致了争取独立的斗争。至于英国的十三个殖民地,我们将在下面论述美国革命的一节中详细考察。这里只要提一下托马斯·潘恩、本杰明·富兰克林和托马斯·杰斐逊正像伏尔泰、卢梭和孟德斯鸠那样完全是哲人就够了。毕竟,正是杰斐逊宣布每个人都有两个祖国:“他自己的国家和法国。”

——斯塔夫里阿诺斯《全球通史》

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2016-05-11 04:48:40

答案(点此获取答案解析)

同类题2

阅读理解

    In a historic moment on June 26, the US Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage is a legal right across all 50 states. The Supreme Court justices ruled states cannot deny gay men and women the same marriage rights. The decision means the 13 states with bans on same-sex marriage are no longer able to enforce them.

    Same-sex couples “ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law”. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion: “The Constitution grants them that right.”

    The decision came after decades of litigation(诉讼) and activism. It set off celebrations across the US. In affected states including Georgia, Michigan, Ohio and Texas, same-sex couples rushed to wed, while officials in Mississippi and Louisiana said marriages had to wait until procedural issues were addressed, reported the BBC.

    According to “The New York Times”, the ruling came against the backdrop of fast-moving changes in public opinion in the US, with polls indicating that most Americans now approve of same-sex marriage.

    US President Barack Obama welcomed the ruling, saying it “affirms what millions of Americans already believe in their hearts.” “Today,” he said in a press release, “we can say, in no uncertain terms, that we have made our union a little more perfect.”

Another win.

    This was the second time the Supreme Court took up same-sex marriage, according to an article in “Business Insider”. The first time, in June 2013, the court made a decision that allowed the US federal government to recognize same-sex marriages in states where they were already legal.

    But at that time, the Supreme Court declined to rule on the broader question about gay marriage: Is there a constitutional(宪法的) right to same-sex marriage? The June 26 ruling gave a positive answer to that question.

Justice Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion that the Constitution should evolve with societal changes.

    “The nature of injustice is that we may not always see it in our own times,” he wrote. “The generations that wrote and ratified the “Bill of Rights” and the “Fourteenth Amendment(修正案)” did not exactly know the extent of freedom in all of its dimensions, and so they hoped the future generations can protect the right of all persons to enjoy liberty as we learn its meaning.”

    The Fourteenth Amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the law. In the June 26 ruling, the Supreme Court declared that the equal protection clause of the amendment requires marriage rights be extended to same-sex couples, too.