题干

在我国实行民族区域自治,是国家尊重和保障人权的重要体现。下列说法正确的是
①民族区域自治是我国的基本民族政策,也是我国的根本政治制度
②民族区域自治制度是在少数民族居住的地方行使自治权的制度
③民族区域自治制度适合我国国情,其核心内容是自治权
④民族区域自治地方是在中央统一领导下的地方行政区域

A:①②

B:②③

C:③④

D:②④

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2012-08-29 01:34:22

答案(点此获取答案解析)

C

同类题3

阅读文段,回答下面的问题。

拥你入睡

肖复兴

      儿子上初一以后,忽然一下子长大了。换内裤,要躲在被子里换;洗澡,再也不用妈妈帮助洗,连我帮他搓搓后背都不用了。

      我知道,儿子长大了,像日子一样无可奈何地长大了。原来拥有的天然的肌肤之亲和无所顾忌的亲昵,都被儿子这长大拉开了距离,变得有些羞涩了。任何事物都有一些失去,才有一些得到吧?

      有一天下午,儿子复习功课,累了,躺在我的床上看电视,刚看了一会儿眼皮就打架了。他忽然翻了一个身,倚在我的怀里,让我搂着他睡上一觉,迷迷糊糊中嘱咐我一句:“一小时后叫我,我还得复习呢!”

      我有些受宠若惊。许久,许久,儿子没有这种亲昵的动作了。以前,就是一早睡醒了,他还要光着小屁股钻进你的被窝里,和你腻乎腻乎。现在,让你搂着他像搂着只小猫一样入睡,简直类似天方夜谭了。

      莫非懵懵懂懂中,睡意朦胧中,儿子一下子失去了现实,跌进了逝去的童年,记忆深处掀起了清新动人的一角?让他情不由己地拾蘑菇一样拾起他现在并不是想拒绝的往日温馨?

      儿子确实像小猫一样睡在我的怀里。均匀的呼吸,胸脯和鼻翼轻轻起伏着,像春天小河里升起又降落的暖洋洋的气泡。

      我想起他小时候,妈妈上班,家又拥挤,他在一边玩,我在一边写东西,玩着玩腻了,他要喊“爸爸,你什么时候写完呀?陪我玩玩不行吗?”我说:“快啦!快啦!”却永远快不了,心和笔被拽走得远远的。他等不及了,就跑过来跳在我的怀里带有几分央求的口吻说:“爸爸!我不捣乱,我就坐这儿,看你写,行吗?”我怎么能说不行?已经把儿子孤零零地抛到一边,寂寞了那么长时光!我搂着他,腾出一只手接着写。

      那时候,好多东西都是这样搂着儿子写出来的。他给我安详,给我亲情,给我灵感。他一点儿也不闹,一句话也不讲,就那么安安静静倚在我的怀里,像落在我身上的一只小鸟,看我写,仿佛看懂了我写的那些或哭或笑或哭笑交加的故事。其实,那时他认识不了几个字。有好几次,他倚在我的怀里睡着了,睡得那么香那么甜,我都没有发现……

      以后我常常想起那段艰辛却温馨的写作日子,想起儿子倚在我怀中小鸟一样静静睡着的情景。我觉得我的那些东西里有儿子的影子、呼吸,甚至睡着之后做的那些个灿若星光的梦。

      儿子长大了。纵使我又写了很多比那时要好的故事,却再也寻不回那时的感觉、那一份梦境。因为儿子再不会像鸟儿一样蹦上你的枝头,倚在你的怀里睡着了。

      如今,儿子居然缩小了一圈,岁月居然回溯几年。他倚在我的怀里睡得那么香甜、恬静。我的胳膊被他枕麻了,我不敢动,我怕弄醒他,我知道这样的机会不会很多甚至不会再有,我要珍惜。我格外小心翼翼地拥着他,像拥着一支又轻又软又薄又透明的羽毛,生怕稍稍一失手,羽毛就会袅袅飞去……

      并不是我太娇贵儿子,实在是他不会轻易地让你拥他入睡。他已经长大,嘴唇上方已经展起一层细细的绒毛,喉结也已经像要啄破壳的小鸟一样在蠕动。用不了多久,他会长得比我还要高,这张床将伸不开他的四肢……

      一个小时过去了,我没有舍得叫醒儿子。

同类题4

阅读理解

    This brief book is aimed at high school students, but speaks to anyone learning at any stage of life.

    Its formal, serious style closely matches its content, a school-masterly book on schooling. The author, W. H. Armstrong, starts with the basics: reading and writing. In his opinion, reading doesn't just mean recognizing each word on the page; it means taking in the information, digesting it and incorporating it into oneself just as one digests a sandwich and makes it a part of himself. The goal is to bring the information back to life, not just to treat it as dead facts on paper from dead trees. Reading and writing cannot be completely separated from each other; in fact, the aim of reading is to express the information you have got from the text. I've seen it again and again: some one who can't express an idea after reading a text is just as ineffective as someone who hasn't read it at all.

    Only a third of the book remains after that discussion, which Armstrong devotes to specific tips for studying languages, math, science and history. He generally handles these topics thoroughly and equally, except for some weakness in the science and math sections and a bit too much passion (激情) regarding history to his students, that was a hundred times more than my history teachers ever got across. To my disappointment, in this part of the book he ignores the arts. As a matter of fact, they demand all the concentration and study that math and science do, though the study differs slightly in kind. Although it's commonly believed that the arts can only be naturally acquired, actually, learning the arts is no more natural than learning French or mathematics.

    My other comment is that the text aged. The first edition apparently dates to the 1960s—none of the references(参考文献) seem newer than the late 1950s. As a result, the discussion misses the entire computer age.

    These are small points, though, and don't affect the main discussion. I recommend it to any student and any teacher, including the self-taught student.