题干

[历史一一选修1:历史上重大改革回眸]

材料:新中国成立以来的户籍制度改革经历了不同的历程。

1958年,全国人大常委会通过《中华人民共和国户口登记条例》,第一次明确将城乡居民区分为“农业户口”和“非农业户口”两种不同户籍。

1964年8月《公安部关于处理户口迁移的规定(草案)》出台,对从农村迁往城市、集镇的要严加限制;对从集镇迁往城市的要严加限制。

1984年10月,《国务院关于农民进入集镇落户问题的通知》规定,农民可以自理口粮进集镇落户,并同集镇居民一样享有同等权利,履行同等义务。

1997年6月,《国务院批转公安部小城镇户籍管理制度改革试点方案和关于完善农村户籍管理制度意见的通知》出台,规定已在小城镇就业、居住、并符合定条件的农村人口,可以在小城镇办理城镇常住户口。

2001年3月颁布的《国务院批转公安部关于推进小城镇户籍管理制度改革意见的通知》,对办理小城镇常住户口的人员不再实行计划指标管理。

2014年7月30日,国务院公布了《关于进一步推进户籍制度改革的意见》,明确提出建立城乡统一的户口登记制度。

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2018-01-22 12:01:21

答案(点此获取答案解析)

同类题4

阅读下列材料,从每题所给的四个选项(A、B、C和D)中,选出最佳选项.

    One of the executives gathered at the Aspen Institute for a day-long leadership workshop using the works of Shakespeare was discussing the role of Brutus in the death of Julius Caesar. “Brutus was not an honorable man,” he said. “He was a traitor(叛徒). And he murdered someone in cold blood.” The agreement was that Brutus had acted with cruelty when other options were available to him. He made a bad decision, they said—at least as it was presented by Shakespeare—to take the lead in murdering Julius Caesar. And though one of the executives acknowledged that Brutus had the good of the republic in mind, Caesar was nevertheless his superior. “You have to endeavor,” the executives said, “our policy is to obey the chain of command.”

    During the last few years, business executives and book writers looking for a new way to advise corporate America have been exploiting Shakespeare’s wisdom for profitable ends. None more so than husband and wife team Kenneth and Carol Adelman, well-known advisers to the White House, who started up a training company called “Movers and Shakespeares”. They are amateur Shakespeare scholars and Shakespeare lovers, and they have combined their passion and their high level contacts into a management training business. They conduct between 30 and 40 workshops annually, focusing on half a dozen different plays, mostly for corporations, but also for government agencies.

    The workshops all take the same form, focusing on a single play as a kind of case study, and using individual scenes as specific lessons. In Julius Caesar , sly provocation(狡诈的挑唆) of Brutus to take up arms against the what was a basis for a discussion of methods of team building and grass roots organism.

    Although neither of the Adelmans is academically trained in literature, the programmes, contain plenty of Shakespeare tradition and background. Their workshop on Henry V, for example, includes a helpful explanation of Henry’s winning strategy at the Battle of Agincourt. But they do come to the text with a few biases (偏向): their reading of Henry V minimizes his misuse of power. Instead, they emphasize the story of the youth who seizes opportunity and becomes a masterful leader. And at the workshop on Caesar, Mr. Adelmans had little good to say about Brutus, saying “the noblest Roman of them all” couldn’t make his mind up about things.

    Many of the participants pointed to very specific elements in the play that they felt related Caesar’s pride, which led to his murder, and Brutus's mistakes in leading the  after the murder, they said, raise vital questions for anyone serving as a business when and how do you resist the boss?