题干

元朝时期将工匠编入专门的“匠籍”,称做“匠户”,规定其身份世袭,不得脱籍改业;明代将匠户制度改为轮班轮作,允许班匠以银代役;清顺治年间宣布废除“匠籍”。上述变化(    )

①体现出古代官营手工业管理体制的调整

②使统治者能够更方便快捷地征调各类工匠 

③反映了官营手工业者人身依附关系的日趋松弛

④顺应了时代发展的进步潮流

A:①②

B:②④

C:①③④

D:①②③④

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2014-06-17 09:15:50

答案(点此获取答案解析)

C

同类题5

阅读理解

    Should we allow modern buildings to be built next to older buildings in a historic area of a city? In order to answer this question, we must first examine whether people really want to preserve the historic feel of an area. Not all historical buildings are attractive. However, there may be other reasons—for example, economic (经济的) reasons—why they should be preserved. So, let us assume that historical buildings are both attractive and important to the majority of people. What should we do then if a new building is needed?

    In my view, new architectural styles can exist perfectly well alongside an older style. Indeed, there are many examples in my own home town of Tours where modern designs have been placed very successfully next to old buildings. As long as the building in question is pleasing and does not dominate (影响) its surroundings too much, it often improves the attractiveness of the area.

    It is true that there are examples of new buildings which have spoilt (破坏) the area they are in, but the same can be said of some old buildings too. Yet people still speak against new buildings in historic areas. I think this is simply because people are naturally conservative(保守的)and do not like change.

    Although we have to respect people’s feelings as fellow users of the buildings, I believe that it is the duty of the architect and planner to move things forward . If we always reproduced what was there before, we would all still be living in caves. Thus, I would argue against copying previous architectural styles and choose something fresh and different , even though that might be the more risky choice.