题干

阅读文言文,回答问题

    汪若海,字东叟,歙人。未弱冠,游京师,入太学。靖康元年,会金人侵扰,朝廷下诏求知兵者,若海应诏。时已割河北地。其年冬,再犯京师,若海谓:“河北国家重地,当用河北以揽天下之权,不可怯懦以自守,闭关养敌,坐受其敝。”属康王起兵相州,乃上书枢密曹辅,请立王为大元帅,拥兵镇抚河北,以掎金人之后,则京城之围自解。辅大喜,即以其书进钦宗,用为参谋,遣如康王所。宰相何执异议,以道梗为辞,不果遣。

    高宗既即位,朝廷以张浚宣抚川、陕,议未决。若海谓:“天下如常山蛇势,秦蜀为首,东南为尾,中原为脊。今以东南为首,安能起天下之脊?将图恢复,必在川陕。” 乃往见浚,极谈终日,浚大惊,辟以自随,以亲老辞。时节制江夏军马李允文跋扈不用朝命,朝廷命招讨使张俊屯江西,得若海道中,喜甚。谓曰:“李允文怀反侧,非君莫能开其自新。”若海即驰往,谕以成败逆顺,示以朝廷威德,复谈三策以动之,辞旨明畅。允文大感悟,即举军东下。若海复为书招其徒张用、曹成、李宏、马友同归朝廷。用以其众二十万解甲效顺,惟成疑贰有他志,若海移书责之。成怒,将杀若海,若海夜宿王林军帐,以计得林军印,遂夺其众五千人。翼日,成遂遁。

    绍兴九年,复三京,祗谒陵寝,事还。金人奄至,太尉刘锜甫至,众不满三万,遣人丐援于朝,无敢往者。若海毅然请行,具述锜明方略,善用兵,以偏师济之,必有成功。朝廷从之金兵果败去。未几,丁内艰。服除,添差通判信州。秩满,迁湖北帅司参议。知道州,陛辞得对,上曰:“久不见卿,卿向安在?”授直秘阁、知江州,丁父忧。时方经略中原,朝廷议起若海,而若海死矣。

    若海豁达高亮,深沈有度,耻为世俗章句学,为文操纸笔立就,蹈厉风发。

《宋史·汪若海传》

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2018-12-26 07:26:31

答案(点此获取答案解析)

同类题3

阅读理解

    Teachers in some secondary schools in Britain are worried that their job may become impossible shortly unless something can be done to restore discipline in the classrooms. In the problem schools, mostly in large cities, a small minority of teenage pupils disturb lesson to such an extent that the teacher can no longer teach their classes effectively.

    Some people consider that the permissive (随意) nature of modern society is responsible for such kind of behavior. Small children who are continuously encouraged to express themselves without reservation are naturally unwilling to accept school discipline when they grow older. Furthermore, modern teaching techniques) which appear to stress personal enjoyment at the expense of serious study work, might be teaching the child to put his own interests before his duties to the community in which he lives.

    Perhaps the problem can be solved by improving facilities for the moral guidance of these difficult children or by better cooperation between the schools and the parents—for the parents may be mainly responsible for the bad behavior of their youngsters. Violence at home, violence and crime on TV make some children turn violence themselves.

    But some of the teachers believe that there ought to be a return to more “old fashioned” methods. At present, in some school teachers are even not allowed to punish a child who does something bad and wrong. Physical punishment is not permitted now. People are too soft on children these days. It seems that children can do whatever they like at school while the teachers can't do anything to punish them. I don't know why the schools authority abandoned some of the effective punishments that worked well. Things like that didn't happen when we were at school because the teachers kept those problem students under control by using a stick.