题干

纵观古今,任何一个国家、任何一个时期,政治体制的变化,都会影响这个国家和社会的发展。阅读下列材料,回答问题:

材料一:在中国长达数千年的历史上,有过三次大革命,他们从根本上改变了中国的政治结构和社会结构。第一次发生在公元前221年,……第二次发生于1911年,……第三次在1949年的……”

——斯塔夫里阿诺斯《全球通史》

材料二:“民国”之取代自秦始皇以来两千多年的“帝国”,是中国近代内在矛盾发展的结果,是一种前无古人的变化。它打破了历代王朝的更迭机制,否定了整个皇权体制,因而也触动了传统社会的各条神经,是政治制度和社会思想的一大跃进。

——陈旭麓《近代中国社会的新陈代谢》

材料三:“光荣革命后英国建立了一个合适的政治制度,这个制度保证社会有宽松、和平的环境。”“光荣革命创造了一种适合英国历史和政治传统的新的社会进步方式,那就是:用和平变革的方式体现社会进步。这种模式,成为它为后世留下的最独特的遗产。从此以后,英国就是在议会制度的框架之内,进行和平和渐进的制度改革。”

——钱乘旦《英国通史》

材料四:从美利坚合众国形成的过程和背景来看,美国的立国经验是独特的。首先,和西方大多数国家不一样,美利坚合众国的建立不是自上而下,而是自下而上完成的,国家体系的形成是先有州而后才有国家。其次,“州”的地位的演变,一直是这个国家形成过程中的关键,州先由殖民地上升为独立之“邦”,后又降格为从属于联邦的成员,不管其地位如何演变,但始终都保持着相当的独立性。再次,由于合众国直接脱胎于“联合殖民地”,因此这种联合的程度和方式作为一种标志,不仅划分了这个国家形成过程中的不同阶段,也在一定程度上决定了这个国家组织和结构的形式,而与其他任何国家不同。

——何顺果《美国史通论》

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2017-11-30 02:05:41

答案(点此获取答案解析)

同类题5

阅读下列短文,从每题所给的四个选项中,选出最佳选项。

The health-care economy is filled with unusual and even unique economic relationships. One of the least understood involves the peculiar roles of producer or “provider” and purchaser or “consumer” in the typical doctor-patient relationship. In most sectors of the economy, it is the seller who attempts to attract a potential buyer with various appealing factors of price, quality, and use, and it is the buyer who makes the decision. Such condition, however, is not common in most of the health-care industry.

In the health-care industry, the doctor-patient relationship is the mirror image of the ordinary relationship between producer and consumer. Once an individual has chosen to see a physician — and even then there may be no real choice — it is the physician who usually makes all significant purchasing decisions: whether the patient should return “next Wednesday”, whether X-rays are needed, whether drugs should be prescribed, etc. It is rare that a patient will challenge such professional decisions or raise in advance questions about price, especially when the disease is regarded as serious.

This is particularly significant in relation to hospital care. The physician must certify the need for hospitalization, determine what procedures will be performed, and announce when the patient may be discharged. The patient may be consulted about some of the decisions, but in general it is the doctor's judgments that are final. Little wonder then that in the eye of the hospital it is the physician who is the real “consumer”. As a consequence, the medical staff represents the “power center” in hospital policy and decision-making, not the administration.

Although usually there are in this situation four identifiable participants— the physician, the hospital, the patient, and the payer (generally an insurance carrier or government) — the physician makes the essential decisions for all of them. The hospital becomes an extension of the physician; the payer generally meets most of the bills generated by the physician/hospital, and for the most part the patient plays a passive role. We estimate that about 75-80 percent of health-care choices are determined by physicians, not patients. For this reason, the economy directed at patients or the general is relatively ineffective.