题干

当地时间2016年11月9日凌晨,美国总统选举揭晓,共和党总统候选人    当选美国第五十八届总统。(    )

A:杰布·布什

B:唐纳德·特朗普

C:希拉里·克林顿

D:米特·罗姆尼

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2013-03-15 10:05:21

答案(点此获取答案解析)

B

同类题3

阅读下文,回答相关问题。
                                                                                                                 枕边的夜莺
         ①我喜欢躺着读书,这个习惯的养成已有二十多年了,从枕边过的书,自然是少不了的。
         ②十七八岁,我读师专的时候,开始了真正的读书。每到寒暑假,最惬意的事情,就是躺在故乡的火炕上看书。至于读了些什么,已经记不清了,但读书的氛围却历历在目。夏天时,闻够了墨香,我会敞开窗子,嗅花圃搅起的一波一波的香气;冬天时,窗外的北风吹得窗纸刷拉拉响,我便把书页也翻得刷拉拉响。疲倦的时候,我会撇下书,趴在窗台看风景。窗外的园田被雪花装点得一片洁白,像是老天铺下来的一张纸。 
        ③如果说枕头是花托的话,那么书籍就是花瓣。花托只有一个,花瓣却是层层叠叠的。每一本看过的书,都是一片谢了的花瓣。有的花瓣可以当做标本,作为永久的珍藏;有的则因着庸常,随着风雨化作泥了。
         ④这二十多年来,不管我的读书趣味发生了怎样的变化,有一类书始终横在我的枕畔,就像一个永不破碎的梦,那就是古诗词。夜晚,读几首喜欢的诗词,就像吃了可口的夜宵,入睡时心里暖暖的。
         ⑤我最喜欢的词人,是辛弃疾。一句“青山遮不住,毕竟东流去”,让我对他的词永生爱意,《稼轩集》便是百读不厌的了。屈原、李白、杜甫、白居易、李商隐、陆游、苏轼、李清照、李煜、纳兰性德、温庭筠、黄庭坚、范仲淹,也都令我喜爱。有的时候,读到动心处,我会忍不住低声吟诵出来,好像不经过如此“咀嚼”,就愧对了这甘美至极的“食粮”似的。
        ⑥我父亲最推崇的诗人,就是曹植了。因为爱极了他的《洛神赋》,我一出生,父亲就把“子建”的名字给了我。长大成人后,我不止一次读过《洛神赋》,总觉得它的辞藻过于华丽,浓艳得有点让人眼晕。直到前几年,我的个人生活遭遇变故,再读《洛神赋》,读出了一种朴素而凄清的美!洛水上的神仙宓妃,惊鸿一现,顷刻间就化做烟波了。“悼良会之永绝兮,哀一逝而异乡”,“恨人神之道殊兮”,这才是曹植最想表达的。他以短短一曲《洛神赋》,写出了爱情的短暂,圣洁,美好,写出了世事的无常。我真的没有想到,曹植在诗中所描述的一切,正是我此刻的感悟,原来父亲早就知道,幻影才是永恒的啊!所以现在读《洛神赋》,别有一番滋味在心头!
        ⑦中国的古典诗词,意境优美,禅意深厚,能够开启心智。当你愤慨于生活中种种的不公,却又无可奈何时,读一读黄庭坚的“贤愚千载知谁是?满眼蓬蒿共一丘”,你就会获得解脱。而当你意志消沉、黯然神伤时,读一读张若虚的《春江花月夜》和陶渊明的《桃花源记》,你就会觉得所有的不快都是过眼云烟。从这个意义上说,那些古诗词就是我枕畔的《圣经》。
        ⑧这些伟大的诗人,之所以能写出流传千古的词句,在于他们有着对黑暗永不妥协的精神。他们高洁的灵魂,使个人的不幸得到了升华。杜甫评价李白时,曾满怀怜惜和愤懑地写道:“敏捷诗千首,飘零酒一杯”,而这是那个时代大多数诗人坎坷命运的真实写照!个人的生死,在他们眼里,不过草芥,所以他们的诗词才有着大悲悯、大哀愁,这也是我深深喜爱他们的原因。
        ⑨我常想,我枕边的一册册古诗词,就是一只只夜莺,它们栖息在书林中,婉转地歌唱。它们清新、湿润,宛如上天撒向尘世的一场宜人的夜露。
                                                                                                                                                                                                                               (有删改)

同类题5

阅读下面短文,然后用60个单词左右概括短文的要点。

    Getting rid of dirt, in the opinion of most people, is a good thing. However, there is nothing fixed about attitudes to dirt.

    In the early 16th century, people thought that dirt on the skin was a means to block out disease, as medical opinion had it that washing off dirt with hot water could open up the skin and let ills in. A particular danger was thought to lie in public baths. By 1538, the French king had closed the bath houses in his kingdom. So did the king of England in 1546. Thus began a long time when the rich and the poor in Europe lived with dirt in a friendly way. Henry IV, King of France, was famously dirty. Upon learning that a nobleman had taken a bath, the king ordered that, to avoid the attack of disease, the nobleman should not go out.

    Though the belief in the advantage of dirt was long-lived, dirt has no longer been regarded as a nice neighbor ever since the 18th century. Scientifically speaking, cleaning away dirt is good to health. Clean water supply and hand washing are practical means of preventing disease. Yet, it seems that standards of cleanliness have moved beyond science since World War Ⅱ. Advertisements repeatedly sell the idea; clothes need to be whiter than white, cloths ever softer, surfaces to shine. Has the hate for dirt, however, gone too far?

    Attitudes to dirt still differ hugely nowadays. Many first-time parents nervously try to warn their children off touching dirt, which might be responsible for the spread of disease. On the contrary, Mary Ruebush, an American immunologist (免疫学家), encourages children to play in the dirt to build up a strong immune system. And the latter position is gaining some reason.