题干

随着生活水平的日益提高,人们对餐桌上食品的安全问题逐渐担忧起来.继三聚氰胺奶粉事件之后,瘦肉精、牛肉膏等食品安全问题又一次引起了人们的高度关注.瘦肉精能促进猪的骨骼肌(瘦肉)蛋白质合成和减少脂肪沉积,明显增加瘦肉率.人体对“瘦肉精”十分敏感,食用后会出现头晕、恶心、手脚颤抖等症状.它还能降低人体血红蛋白的携氧能力.特别对心脏病、高血压患者危害更大,长期食用则可能导致慢性中毒.如果瘦肉精在肝脏能被分解成含氮废物,则该废物在下列部位中含量最少的是(  )

A:出球小动脉

B:原尿

C:肾静脉

D:肾小管

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2018-03-28 01:44:35

答案(点此获取答案解析)

C

同类题2

阅读理解

    This brief book is aimed at high school students, but speaks to anyone learning at any stage of life.

    Its formal, serious style closely matches its content, a school-masterly book on schooling. The author, W. H. Armstrong, starts with the basics: reading and writing. In his opinion, reading doesn't just mean recognizing each word on the page; it means taking in the information, digesting it and incorporating it into oneself just as one digests a sandwich and makes it a part of himself. The goal is to bring the information back to life, not just to treat it as dead facts on paper from dead trees. Reading and writing cannot be completely separated from each other; in fact, the aim of reading is to express the information you have got from the text. I've seen it again and again: some one who can't express an idea after reading a text is just as ineffective as someone who hasn't read it at all.

    Only a third of the book remains after that discussion, which Armstrong devotes to specific tips for studying languages, math, science and history. He generally handles these topics thoroughly and equally, except for some weakness in the science and math sections and a bit too much passion (激情) regarding history to his students, that was a hundred times more than my history teachers ever got across. To my disappointment, in this part of the book he ignores the arts. As a matter of fact, they demand all the concentration and study that math and science do, though the study differs slightly in kind. Although it's commonly believed that the arts can only be naturally acquired, actually, learning the arts is no more natural than learning French or mathematics.

    My other comment is that the text aged. The first edition apparently dates to the 1960s—none of the references(参考文献) seem newer than the late 1950s. As a result, the discussion misses the entire computer age.

    These are small points, though, and don't affect the main discussion. I recommend it to any student and any teacher, including the self-taught student.