题干

阅读理解

    It was an oral English class and in front of us was standing our teacher Lila Betray, who was a university student from the US. Somehow we came to the point whether any of us could sing an English pop song in front of the class. You know, maybe three or more out of ten Chinese students are shy in class. As a result, there was silence in class for quite a while, which made everybody feel rather embarrassed (尴尬的), including the teacher.

    I was a shy boy. However, just at that moment, a great idea struck me suddenly. “Seize the enjoyment! Seize the chance. Yes, there couldn't be a better chance.” I said to myself. “Why not seize it? Why should I have always to be the guy regretting missing the opportunity just because of shyness? Yes, maybe I should have a try!”

    So, I raised my hand. And I remember that it took me quite a while to think what the song's name was. Though I sang no more than five sentences because of forgetting the lyrics (歌词), their clapping hands told me that I did the job well. Later, I got a gift and I was really happy.

    I think that is one of the most unforgettable moments in my life. Through this experience, I've also got to know that we should believe that we can do the job well, no matter how difficult it seems for us. Just have a little more courage.

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2020-01-30 09:12:12

答案(点此获取答案解析)

同类题2

阅读下面的文字,完成下列小题。

    做哲学研究,关键是面向哲学问题,提出理论去回答和解决这些问题。中国哲学家要继续研究那些传统上仍未解决的重要学理性问题,也要直面当代社会现实生活的需要,从中提炼出相关的哲学问题,或者赋予旧问题以新形式,或者在新背景中探讨老问题,发展新的哲学理论。歌德说得好:“理论是灰色的,生活之树常青。”

    新探索必须从学术传统中寻求强大支撑。即使是一位原创的思想者,也需要从学术传统和学术同行那里获得激励,从而加强自己思想的论证力量。常常有这样的现象,即使是那些自称原创的学者,在阐述他们的思想时,也会把许多伟大的先贤和著名的同辈引为同道。例如,当代美国哲学家布兰顿(Robert Brandom)是“分析实用主义”的代表性人物,创造了“推理主义语义学”,但他按自己的理解,大量征引解说康德、黑格尔、弗雷格、维特根斯坦、塞拉斯、罗蒂、达米特以及他的同事麦克道维尔,把他们视为自己的先驱和同道。

    新探索需要学术共同体的共同参与。俗话说,“众人拾柴火焰高”。一位独立的研究者要从他的学术同行那里获得反馈,不管这种反馈是赞扬、改进、批评,还是彻底的否定,由此产生相互切磋甚至是论战,从而促进相互理解,共同进步。但中国哲学界目前的状况是:各位学者埋头于自己的工作,对同行所发表的著述基本上不读不看,当然更不评论,实际上没有形成真正意义上的学术交流,这种情况必须改变。可以仿效国外学术出版机构的做法:在匿名审稿过程中,凡是不征引、不讨论当代学术同行工作的相关论著,都不接受发表或出版。循此办法,逐渐硬性地建立起真正意义上的学术共同体。

    新探索需要学术共同体的共同参与。俗话说,“众人拾柴火焰高”。一位独立的研究者要从他的学术同行那里获得反馈,不管这种反馈是赞扬、改进、批评,还是彻底的否定,由此产生相互切磋甚至是论战,从而促进相互理解,共同进步。但中国哲学界目前的状况是:各位学者埋头于自己的工作,对同行所发表的著述基本上不读不看,当然更不评论,实际上没有形成真正意义上的学术交流,这种情况必须改变。可以仿效国外学术出版机构的做法:在匿名审稿过程中,凡是不征引、不讨论当代学术同行工作的相关论著,都不接受发表或出版。循此办法,逐渐硬性地建立起真正意义上的学术共同体。

(摘编自陈波《哲学研究——诠释与创新并重》,2017年第15期《新华文摘》)