题干

阅读下文,回答相关问题。

        胡质之子威,字伯虎。少有志向,厉操清白。质之为荆州也,威自京都省之。家贫,无车马童仆,威自驱驴单行,拜见父。停厩中十余日,告归。临辞质赐绢一匹,为道路粮。威跪曰:“大人清白,不审于何得此绢。”质曰:“是吾俸禄之余,故以为汝粮耳。”威受之,辞归。每至客舍,自放驴,取樵炊爨,食毕,复随旅进道,往还如是。质帐下都督,素不相识,先其将归,请假还家,阴资装,百余里要之,因与为伴,每事佐助经营之,又少进饮食,行数百里。威疑之,密诱问,乃知其都督也,因取向所赐绢答谢而遣之。后因他信,具以白质。质杖其都督一百,除吏名。其父子清慎如此,于是名誉著闻。晋武帝赐见,叹其父清,谓威曰:“卿清孰与父清?”威对曰:“臣不如也。”帝曰:“以何为不如?”对曰:“臣父清恐人知,臣清恐人不知,是臣不如者远也。”

上一题 下一题 0.0难度 选择题 更新时间:2017-07-12 06:06:22

答案(点此获取答案解析)

同类题4

阅读理解

     The World Meat Free Day for 2017 falls on 12, June, but what would actually happen if the whole world suddenly went vegetarian(素食的) permanently?

     If vegetarianism were accepted by everyone by 2050, the world would have about seven million fewer deaths every year. No meat would lower the chances of some diseases or even some cancers and so save the world 2-3% global GDP in medical bills. Food-related emissions would drop by around 60%. This would be due to getting rid of red meat which come from methane (甲烷) producing livestock (家畜) — from people's diets. Turning former pastures (牧场) into native habitats and forests would slow climate change and bring back lost biodiversity, including some animals which were previously pushed out or killed in order to keep cattle.

    However, farmers in the developing world could really suffer. Arid and semi-arid lands can only be used to raise animals as there's no or little water in these places, such as the Sahel land strip in Africa next to the Sahara; nomadic (游牧的) groups that keep livestock there would be forced to settle permanently and lose their cultural identities if there were no more meat. Losing meat also means that we also lose traditions. There's no more Christmas turkey. We would need to replace meat with nutritional substitutes, in particular for the world's estimated two billion-plus unhealthy or weak people for lack of nutrients. Animal products contain more nutrients per calorie than staples like grains and rice.

    Everybody currently engaged in the livestock industry would need to be retrained for a new career. This could be in agriculture, reforestation or producing bioenergy. Failing to provide career alternatives could lead to mass unemployment and social problems, particularly in traditionally rural communities.