选出与其它三个发音不同的选项。

( 1 )____ A. cinema   B. coat       C. cool      D. cup

( 2 )____ A. dance    B. rice       C. class      D. nice

( 3 )____ A. juice     B.ice cream   C. cinema    D. cake

( 4 )____ A. race      B. book      C. cook     D. car

    Regardless of how far we'd like to believe gender(性别) equality in the workplace has come, there's still a yawning gap between male and female leaders in the professional world. A 2018 statistic shows that women nowadays hold just 5.8 percent of CEOs positions at S&P 500 companies, according to Catalyst.

    While it's not a huge shock that women are somewhat underrepresented in leadership positions, what is surprising though, is the fact that females may actually be better suited to lead in almost every area, at least according to new findings from the BI Norwegian Business School.

    In their research，Professor yvind L. Martinsen and Professor Lars Glas surveyed (调查)2,900 managers with a special focus on personality types. The results were clear: Women scored higher than men in four of the five major leadership-centric categories.

    While some people believe that men inherently make better leaders — probably because they picture a leader with a commanding voice, which is more typical of men than women — this piece of research suggests that women are better at methodical management and goal-setting, openness, sociability and supportiveness, as well as ability to communicate clearly.

    There was one area in which men scored higher than women, though, and that was on emotional stability and ability to face job-related pressure and stress. The results suggest that women are more sensitive to the effects of high-pressure or highly emotional situations.

    Obviously，it's important to consider individual(个人的) differences. Anyone, regardless of gender, may be an inspiring leader and a competent boss. But next time you're hiring for a management position, you just might want to give the resumes(简历) from female candidates a harder look.

统一是中国历史的主流。历史学家田余庆教授在论文《中国古代史上的国家统一问题》中对中国历史上的三个统一时期进行了系统的论述。文章的第一部分阐述了国土开发和国家统一的关系。阅读以下相关摘要：
材料一  统一的第一个时期，大体上是西周到秦。西周有一个中央政权，在中国北方黄河流域的范围之内发号施令，让自己的功臣、周室宗亲等等各种各样的人到东方去开辟土地。与周代的制度相比，秦汉所形成的统一否定了周的这个政治制度，但是又不是绝对否定。
材料二 秦汉以后到元是第二个阶段，这个时候中国北方，东部和西部结合在一起，要开发的地区是广大的中国南方。秦统一以后，对开发国土做过一件大事，就是迁徙50万身份低下的或犯了罪的人，到岭南去戍守，把中国南方的国土一直推进到南海边上。这对中国以后逐步开发南方起了很大作用。当然，南方处在落后状态，又有很多民族存在，跟北方交融不那么容易完成。历史为此付出了1000多年的时间。
材料三 到了元以后，中国的统一，从地域方面来说进入了第三个时期，理当是开发大西部。元以后，实际上在东部的南北，没有再出现分裂的可能性，问题在于西部。但是元以后中国缺少开发的条件，广大的西部长期处在一个待开发的落后状态。我们今天开发西部是对于中国统一的进一步巩固开启一个新的起点。美国在1 9世纪开发西部，以至于西部和东部走向平衡，维持了美国今天的国情局面。